|
A GOING CONCERN
Last Saturday at Doncaster the official going was 'good,
good to soft in places'. The 'places' they were talking about were clearly in
another county because race times show the ground at Doncaster was actually
riding lightning fast. They ran just a second off the course record in the first
race. And, despite a slow early pace, Casamento clocked the fastest time in the
fifty year history of the Racing Post Trophy.
Misleading going reports persuade punters to choose horses
that are unsuited to the ground. They make it hard to figure out which horses
are suited by a particular surface in the first place. And, perhaps worst of
all, they persuade jockeys to set an early pace that's inappropriate for the
prevailing conditions. On faster ground than reported this leads to a slow early
gallop and a sprint finish like the one we got in the Racing Post Trophy. This
in turn means you have to question whether the best horse won or whether they
simply happened to be in the lead or close to it when the sprint finish began.
In short, the cumulative effect of an inaccurate going
report undermines the confidence of punters in horse racing as a betting medium.
And this is merely one of many areas where racing officials are failing to
provide the betting public with adequate or timely information. It's hardly a
surprise therefore that last week one major bookmaker reported that horse racing
had dropped from being 70% to just 40% of their total betting turnover in recent
years.
Racing officials need to recognise that their sport is no
longer the only game in town. Punters now have the option of wagering on other
sports and different betting mediums - and they're going to continue switching
to them until racing officials recognise that punters are not mugs who'll bet on
anything but smart people seeking to make an informed decision.
MASTER OF HOUNDS LOOKS GOOD FOR THE BC JUVENILE TURF
One of the first lessons we learn as punters in Europe is
to never trust the form in a slowly run race.
This year's Racing Post Trophy was not exactly slow run.
The winner clocked the fastest time ever in the race and came within half a
second of the 2YO track record (admittedly set in a nursery by Singhalese in
2004).
However the early pace was visibly slow and resulted in a
sprint finish which surely affected the outcome.
It's pretty much impossible to take sectional times from
the video of the race due to the way it was filmed. But it looks clear the pace
started to increase at halfway and the runners were in full cry from three
furlongs out to inside the final furlong where the sprint started to tell and
the late runners finally had a chance to close the gap.
The horses which were running 1-2 when the sprint began
filled the first two places while those that were disputing last place at the
time ran second and third. So there has to be a strong suspicion that the latter
will turn out to be the best horses in the race and that the first two beat them
simply because they enjoyed a head start when the race began in earnest.
The winner CASAMENTO (36) benefited from a great ride by
Frankie Dettori. Dettori is renowned for his judgment of pace, so it's not
surprising, as the track commentator noted that he was keen to stick close to
the lead in the early stages and committed for home early.
You could argue that the slow early pace affected the time
or that I've miscalculated in only awarding Casamento a Group 2 speed rating.
But he was the same 1.5 seconds per mile behind the track record as the winner
of the first race, and that was only a handicap. So I think I've tagged him
correctly.
It's usually debatable whether a two year old that's won a
Group race over a mile is going to be effective over the same distance at three.
Very often it's built and bred for longer trips and scored its big win against
other horses of the same type.
You can actually make a very good case on pedigree for
saying that Casamento is a miler or even a sprinter. But looking at his physique
and the way he runs convinces me he's going to prove an out and out middle
distance horse next year.
Casamento showed once more here that he can only lengthen
rather than quicken. He can slowly grind away and gain gradually but is clearly
always going to be vulnerable to a rival with a decent turn of foot over a trip
this short however soft the ground may be. It was a huge plus for him that this
race was run on a straight course. Next year around a turn he won't have as much
time to build up a head of steam.
I could be wrong but I find it hard to put Casamento in the
same class as his soon to be stablemate French Navy as a Derby candidate. That
unbeaten colt has a serious change of gears and will soon have the chance to win
a Group 1 of his own.
Runner up SEVILLE (35) enjoyed the same tactical advantage
as the winner by kicking for home early. He's a strong, rather classy looking
sort that's clearly built and bred for every inch of a mile and a half. It's
possible he'll improve enough over that distance to place in more Group 1's.
Right now though I'm a little sceptical seeing how both Dubai Prince and
Casamento put him in his place after he'd been given every chance of beating
them.
This brings us to third placed MASTER OF HOUNDS (33) who
was held up at the back and unfortunately began his run just as the pace started
to accelerate. He still improved anyway and moved into third.
There was a moment or two when it looked like Master Of
Hounds was going to continue closing the gap rapidly and pull level with the
first two. But the effort of gaining ground into an accelerating pace eventually
told.
This is not the first time that Master Of Hounds has been
caught out by the pace quickening in front of him when he was well behind. It
also happened three runs back at the Curragh when he ran second to stablemate
Roderic O'Connor.
In that race he gave Roderic O'Connor a huge head start
while that one set a moderate early pace.
With four furlongs to go Master Of Hounds was eleven
lengths behind Roderic O'Connor as he began to step up the gallop. When his
stablemate really started sprinting three furlongs out he was still eight
lengths behind.
Roderic O'Connor flew the last three furlongs in about 35.1
seconds. The uphill finish means the fastest it's possible to run the last three
furlongs at the Curragh is about 34 seconds, maybe 33.8. So the five and a half
lengths Master Of Hounds gained on Roderic O'Connor means he was traveling about
as fast as a horse can go - and he was doing so without any pressure at all
being applied from three quarters of a furlong out. Johnny Murtagh had seen some
way out he wasn't going to be able to catch Roderic O'Connor, put his whip down
and just nudged Master Of Hounds along from there.
The subsequent performance of Roderic O'Connor in the
Dewhurst shows that Master Of Hounds was set an impossible task that day.
On his next and most recent outing before the Racing Post
Trophy at Tipperary Johnny Murtagh was clearly determined not to make the same
mistake with Master Of Hounds and hustled his mount out of the gate, looking
determined to take the lead. However when he saw that two rivals were keen to go
a strong pace he took a lead from them and let Master Of Hounds lob along in a
close third. Three furlongs out he switched Master Of Hounds out and asked him
to go by which he quickly did.
It could be that the tremendous acceleration Master Of
Hounds has demonstrated in all four starts since his debut does not mean he's
best held up for a late run. He was so totally in control at Tipperary,
admittedly against inferior opposition, that I suspect he's best ridden close to
the pace as he was there.
Another possibility is that Master Of Hounds' rather short,
somewhat choppy stride pattern means he's suited to softer ground than he's so
far encountered. His sire, dam and best sibling all acted on yielding ground.
The problem with this idea is that in my experience the one thing you can
guarantee a trainer knows about a horse is the going it prefer and Aiden O'Brien
has kept Master Of Hounds to good to firm or firm ground for all five of his
starts so far.
The final and most likely possibility - because it doesn't
assume I know more about race riding than Johnny Murtagh and more about training
than Aiden O'Brien - is that Master Of Hounds short stride and ability to
accelerate quickly make him best suited to races run around a turn, and the
tighter the better.
This being so the Breeders' Cup Juvenile Turf around
Churchill Down's seven furlong turf oval looks a very good target for Master Of
Hounds.
Trainer Aiden O'Brien suggested before the Racing Post
Trophy that one of his two runners would probably go on to contest the Breeders'
Cup Juvenile Turf. Master of Hounds is the only one that's Breeders' Cup
nominated and looks tailor made for the big US race. The fact that he won at
Tipperary, like O'Brien's three previous runners in the BC Juvenile Turf,
suggests the race has been on his agenda for quite some time.
Physically I should note that Master Of Hounds continues to
look like a sprinter-miler to me. His half brother Eishin Apollon got ten
furlongs well enough to run second to Japanese Guineas winner Victoire Pisa, but
he's since been cut back to a mile and nine furlongs.
Fourth placed NATIVE KHAN (33) was held up at the back with
Master Of Hounds and tried to make his run at the same time. Luckily for him his
passage was blocked and he had to switch. This meant that he made his run later
and gained more benefit from his rivals finally getting tired after the
sustained sprint in the final furlong. He ended up finishing well, looking every
inch a middle distance horse.
Native Khan had won both his previous starts in good style,
surging through with his long, flowing stride to win a maiden and the Group 3
Solario Stakes with a bit in hand. He looks like a classy sort that will be best
over ten furlongs physically.
On what he's done to date I can only rate Native Khan as a
Group 3 horse whether I use lines of form or the times of his races. But he
keeps showing reserve energy in his races and looks likely to improve markedly
for the step up to ten furlongs next year.
The overriding concern with Native Khan is always going to
be the ground as he has an unusually long, dead flat stride that's tailor made
for a fast surface. His connections pulled him out of the Washington Singer
Stakes and then the Dewhurst because they were convinced he wouldn't be able to
handle the yielding ground. He got his ground here and was unlucky to have the
race not run to suit him. Next year I'd like to see him go for the Sandown
Classic Trial, the Dante and the Prix du Jockey Club. I can't see him handling
Epsom with that huge stride of his.
I'MSINGINGTHEBLUES GETS INTERESTING
I recognise that I'MSINGINGTHEBLUES invariably cruises
along in his races, looking like a champion but tends to idle in front and lose
when he should have won. I also know he doesn't seem to get home on stiff tracks
or on soft ground or last much beyond two miles. But he was moving so well when
crashing out at the fourth last in the Old Roan Chase that I'm inclined to think
new trainer David Pipe may have fixed something that was ailing the horse and
turned him around.
After all I'msingingtheblues didn't previously seem to like
soft ground or stay beyond two miles. But there he was swinging along four out
on soft ground, looking to be going best of all in one of the season's top two
and a half mile chases. I'm going to be very interested in his chances next time
out, whatever the conditions.
Old MONET'S GARDEN (41) won the race and is clearly still a
nearly unstoppable force over less than three miles off a break of five weeks
plus on anything but a stiff track.
Runner up POQUELIN (41) is a tricky ride as he jumps to the
left. He can't jump fences right handed and must be kept to the inside wing on
left-hand courses to stop him jumping to the left. This can be a problem in big
fields when it gets crowded down the inside so the six runner line up was ideal
for him this time.
For a long way Poquelin looked to be going better than
Monet's Garden but the old boy out battled him and got home narrowly.
Poquelin is always apt to throw in the occasional clunker
when he gets crowded away from the inside in a big field. But in Conditions
Chases like this one with small fields he's always going to be tough to beat
over two and a half miles.
The soft ground was totally against fourth placed ALBERTAS
RUN (28) who must be the most ground dependant top class chaser of recent years.
When the ground is genuinely good or faster he's awfully hard to beat, but on
yielding or softer you can bet against him with utmost confidence.
PACE NOT DISTANCE THE KEY WITH FRANKEL
Some years ago when I was using the Dosage system to
analyse pedigrees I couldn't really fathom why it's chief proponent Dr Franco
Varola was so critical of those who used the numbers the system produced to
predict a horse's stamina.
The system divides sires into five categories - Brilliant,
Classic, Intermediate, Solid and Professional. And up until about fifteen years
ago it had a tremendous record at predicting which three year olds would stay
ten furlongs or more in Group company and which wouldn't. A two year study I
carried out of 10f plus pattern races for 3YO's in Europe showed that horses
whose extended pedigrees earned three or more points in the Solid and
Professional categories won 3.8 times as often as those that didn't. For various
reasons this number fell to 1.9 a few years later. When it dropped even further
I stopped using the system.
Varola said that it was never the intention of the Dosage
system's inventor Colonel Vullier to use it in such a simplistic fashion. He
said it predicted the physical type of horse not their best distance. A
'Brilliant' horse had tremendous pace and acceleration, and as the categories
ascended towards the Professional category they suggested less pace and
acceleration and more endurance. Horses could stay pretty much any distance,
regardless of the category. The categories simply described the way they used
their available energy.
I never really understood this at the time but after seeing
FRANKEL (42) win the Dewhurst Stakes last week I finally got it.
Whatever today's Dosage numbers or pedigree analysts might
say, my bet is Vullier and Varola would tag Frankel as a 'Brilliant' horse for
the purposes of their system. He possesses amazing pace and acceleration. That's
his dominant attribute.
As long as the early pace is slow enough Frankel can win
over any distance by using his astonishing acceleration to outsprint his rivals
in the closing stages. It's akin to a super power, like that of a comic book
hero.
In his second and third starts Frankel ran in races where
the early pace was very slow. As a result he didn't need to tap into the energy
he uses for his sprint finish. So he was able to run away from his rivals to
score by thirteen and ten lengths.
In the Dewhurst the early pace was much stronger, but it
was still relatively slow. They reached the three furlong from home marker 1.5
seconds later than they did in the Challenge Stakes over the same course and
distance. This left Frankel with enough energy to sprint the last three furlongs
1.8 seconds faster than the older horses.
To put it another way the older horses ran at a rate of
12.17 seconds a furlong to the three furlong from home point and decelerated to
12.46 seconds a furlong from there. In Frankel's race they went 12.59 seconds a
furlong to the three furlong from home point and he picked up to run 11.71
seconds a furlong from there.
The favourable pace scenario enabled Frankel to earn the
biggest speed rating I've given a two year old since Xaar won the Dewhurst back
in 1997. However it was noticeable that the early pace was strong enough this
time to force him to dip further into his reserves to the point where it was
beginning to get hard for him to sustain his sprint finish in the last half
furlong.
Two year old racing is made for a horse like Frankel
because in Europe it's the norm for the pace to be slow in the early stages. But
this is not the case when it comes to races for older horses. So, as I see it,
anyone who thinks Frankel is going to continue his dominance next year is
kidding themselves.
If he were mine I would focus Frankel's three year old
season on France and America because the early pace of turf races in both
countries is often slow. I would look particularly for races at Longchamp where
the long downhill run before the homestraight forces the horses to slow down and
ensures that the last three furlongs are run in under 36 seconds pretty much
every time.
The very last race I would want to be running Frankel in is
the 2000 Guineas at Newmarket because so often that is run like a one mile
sprint. Many years the early pace is furious and most years it's strong enough
to run the finish out of a horse like Frankel.
If the campaign that has been mapped out for Frankel's
first few 3YO runs transpires then I can see him sprinting home off a slow
gallop in the Craven, tiring to run unplaced in the Guineas then bouncing back
to form if the pace is slow as it often is in the St James's Palace Stakes. If
instead he tackled the French Guineas and were rested to come back for the Prix
du Moulin and Breeders' Cup Mile I could see him maintaining his unbeaten
record.
The thing to bear in mind with Frankel is that if my theory
about him is right then all the connections of his rivals have to do is employ a
decent pacemaker to beat him. Europe's three top stables - Fabre, Suroor and
particularly Aidan O'Brien - have all shown a willingness to use pacemakers when
it enhances the chances of one of their top horses. Against Frankel it will
always enhance their chances. So there's every possibility Frankel will be
confronted with a series of races in which pacemakers force him to go too fast
early next year.
Runner up RODERIC O'CONNOR (39) looks a better prospect for
the 2000 Guineas than the winner to me. I confess I thought that he only beat
his smart stablemate Master Of Hounds last time because that one gave him too
much start in a race where he was allowed a soft lead. But this run suggests he
actually won that race on merit and is a seriously good Group 1 performer.
I still think O'Brien's very best Guineas prospect is
Zoffany but Roderic O'Connor gives him two powerful shots at the colt's Classic.
I was not alone in suggesting that DREAM AHEAD (33) is
built and runs like and out and out sprinter before the Dewhurst. So I wasn't
surprised to see him tire in the closing stages. I guess it's reasonable for him
to still take his chance in the Guineas before dropping back to sprinting later.
He could be a major force in the top sprints if he can adapt to fast ground. But
he's so big and top heavy there has to be a major concern about that.
CHAMPION STAKES NEEDS A BONUS SCHEME
Just after the start of the Champion Stakes it stuck me
that all but two or three of the runners were using the race as a prep for much
more valuable international races and that this was the reason none of their
jockeys wanted to go on. They didn't want to subject their mounts to a hard race
so the first few furlongs saw them race in a tightly packed bunch in which most
of the horses were fighting for their heads and the pace was a crawl.
With funding for UK horse-racing now hard to come by the
Champion Stakes has fallen from its former lofty status as an end of season
championship. The race simply cannot compete with the prize money offered in the
Japan Cup, Breeders' Cup and Hong Kong Cup run later on. But perhaps it doesn't
have to. Maybe it can thrive through cooperation with those events.
I reckon it would be a smart move to tie the Champion
Stakes in to either the Breeders' Cup or Hong Kong's big December fixture with a
bonus for winning at each meeting. This would ensure we don't have to witness
another Champion Stakes where the jockeys on most of the best runners are scared
of giving their mounts a hard race. A bonus scheme would make it much more
competitive.
The early pace was so slow that it resulted in a flat out
sprint finish in which they covered the last three furlongs an amazing 2.3
seconds faster than top class horses did in the three furlong shorter Challenge
Stakes earlier on the card. They actually finished even faster than Frankel did
in the Dewhurst.
To win or get close in such an extreme sprint finish a
horse has to be in the lead or close to it when the sprint begins. It's
impossible for a horse to gain much ground because it's already running as fast
as physically possible just to keep up.
TWICE OVER (41) won the race for the second year in a row
by kicking on just after the sprint began. He's never going to be anyone's idea
of a Champion but is a wonderfully consistent horse and seems to have a
particular affinity with his home course of Newmarket. If he hadn't bumped into
the brilliant New Approach when second in the 2008 Champion Stakes Twice Over
would now have won six of the seven times he's run at Newmarket.
Runner up VISION D'ETAT (40) was prepping for the Hong Kong
Cup which of course he won last year. Like a lot of the runners he fought for
his head and got into a bit of traffic early on. But he was a close fourth when
the sprint began and picked up nicely to go second a furlong out. When his
jockey saw he couldn't get to twice Over but was holding the rest he just let
him coast home in the final half furlong.
Vision D'Etat was moving smoothly at the finish and full of
run. It was clearly a very promising trial.
It looks like Vision D'Etat has a serious chance of pulling
off the double at Sha Tin. However there still has to be that nagging concern
about his soundness.
Three runs back Vision D'Etat was very nearly forced to be
withdrawn before winning last year's Hong Kong Cup because he was found to be
stiff. It was the same story before the Dubai World Cup next time. He was
eventually allowed to run there too but ran below his best. Trainer Eric Libaud
said the horse returned badly jarred up and blamed the surface. But that seems
unlikely to me because the surface was Tapeta which provides a good deal more
cushion than a typical turf surface or pretty much anything barring soft ground
or deep Fibresand like they have at Southwell. Indeed I noted during the meeting
at Meydan that a lot of horses with dodgy legs bounced back to form thanks to
the extra cushion provided by the Tapeta surface.
It was twenty weeks before Libaud was able to get Vision
D'Etat to the races again. And it's surely significant that he brought him back
in a race run on soft ground at Deauville, the Prix Gontaut Biron. He won
comfortably there from a field better than you'd normally find in a Group 3. And
he ran big here too, though I should add the ground was good to soft.
Vision D'Etat has only managed four runs in the last year
and has had three reported episodes of serious lameness during that time. Is he
going to be able to produce his best on the much firmer surface he's likely to
encounter in Hong Kong?
Trainer John Gosden apparently told a TVG announcer in
America before the race that it was a simply a Breeders Cup prep for his charge
DEBUSSY (39) and that he was not expecting a win because he was best around a
turn. As it turned out Debussy ran a big race thanks to being allowed a very
soft lead. He was tiring in the final furlong, having sustained his sprint for
nearly three furlongs but still ran a good third.
Most people will now think the main question Debussy must
answer in the Breeders' Cup Turf is whether he can stay a mile and a half. But
I'm inclined to agree with Gosden that around Churchill Down's seriously tight
seven furlong oval and off the slow pace they nearly always go in American turf
races stamina is not going to be much of an issue with Debussy on the big day.
A more important issue as I see it is the ground. In Europe
Debussy has won all four times he's run beyond sprint trips on Polytrack (a
surface with plenty of cushion) or on turf where the word 'soft' has appeared in
the official going description. His Arlington Million win was on good ground.
But 'good' is actually the equivalent of yielding in America (firm is their
standard description on turf). This means before this big run on yielding he'd
won five out of five on surfaces with plenty of cushion in them.
Debussy has lost all seven times he's run on a fast
surface, with his sole place in those seven starts being in the Chester Vase.
Gosden said after that race he felt Debussy did not like the firm surface.
The firmest ground Debussy has ever encountered was at
Ascot where he got beat over 40 lengths in his worst ever defeat. That day he
flashed his tail, something he hasn't done elsewhere. The suspicion has to be he
flashed his tail because he was not liking the firm surface and that's why he
ran such a clunker.
The Breeders' Cup has been run six times before at this
year's venue of Churchill Down's. Five of those six times the going was
officially firm. So the odds are clearly against Debussy getting his ground in
the big race, but if he does he'd clearly have a serious shot.
Some horses can run the last quarter mile in under 22
seconds when the early pace has been slow. Gitano Hernando seems unable to do so
in better than the 22.4 seconds he managed last time out at Dundalk. And for
that he needs a clear run where he can build up a head of steam. If he has to
slow down to negotiate traffic then speed up again he's in trouble.
Fourth placed GITANO HERNANDO (38) is apparently under
consideration for the Breeders' Cup despite the fact it would take a
supplementary fee of $100,000 to make him eligible.
Here he was flat to the boards when the sprint began but
then gained ground nicely as the sustained sprint finally caused the field to
tire inside the final furlong.
Looking at his flat, somewhat stilted stride and his
inability to produce a serious burst of speed I have to say that Gitano Hernando
does have many of the attributes of a smart dirt performer. He's clearly very
smart on synthetic surfaces like Polytrack, Tapeta and Pro-Ride. Now I'm
inclined to think he'd adapt well to dirt.
One other big plus about switching to dirt for Gitano
Hernando is that the horses get spread out much more than they do on turf or
synthetic surfaces and this reduces interference massively - something that's an
important consideration for this horse as he's a bit slow to manouver and got
into traffic problems a few times in crowded fields.
If he were mine I'd probably want to make the switch to
dirt in a much easier race than the Breeders' Cup Classic where I wouldn't have
to pay the huge supplementary entry fee. But since it's not my money I'm rather
enthusiastic about the idea of his syndicate handing over the cash. He'd be a
very interesting addition to the Breeders' Cup Classic field.
Fifth placed WIGMORE HALL(38) needs a faster surface to
produce the extraordinary finishing burst he's demonstrated in previous starts.
So he did well to get so close here. He apparently won't be running again this
year but will be targeting big international prizes next season when I'd give a
real shot of picking up something decent.
I liked the way GLASS HARMONIUM (37) managed to finish so
close after clearly disliking the sprint finish over a trip that's surely going
to prove a bit short of his best. He's looked like a Group 1 winner waiting to
happen for a long time to me over a mile and a half. If he gets an invite for
the Japan Cup or the Hong Kong Vase I'd give him a real shot. Next year I see
him as likely to be one of those late developing horses that his trainer Sir
Michael Stoute has shown he can make into a star over 12 furlongs.
FOR NON STOP HARD TO STOP
FOR NON STOP (38) absolutely hosed up on his first start
for new trainer Nick Williams at Chepstow. He sat just behind a strong pace,
moving easily, then kicked on up the straight to simply stroll clear and win
without being extended.
Despite merely having to be nudged along For Non Stop was
so full of run he completed the last half mile two fifths of a second faster
than they did in the higher grade hurdle over half a mile shorter earlier on the
card.
For Non Stop is built for chasing and has already won his
sole point to point start. But he's clearly pattern class over hurdles and could
well improve further when stepped back up to three miles. Seeing that his
official rating is so low it makes sense to try and win a valuable handicap or
two over timber before he tackles the bigger jumps. It could be he needs cut in
the ground to produce this sort of effort, but that's no problem in the Winter
game.
ESCORT'MEN WILL STAY LONGER
ESCORT'MEN (36) ran seriously fast to take the Grade 2
Dovecote Juvenile Hurdle at Kempton last season. He didn't run as quickly to win
on his seasonal debut at Chepstow but would have gone a fair bit faster if he
hadn't landed on all four feet at the last and lost a lot of momentum.
Before his last flight mess up Escort’men had traveled
supremely well and cruised up from last position to take the lead before the
last. The fact that he was able to rally and get back up again after being
almost stopped in his tracks at the last shows just how much he had left in the
tank.
Escort’men is built and bred for chasing and my feeling
is his connections should stick to the original plan of switching him to the
bigger jumps this term despite the fact he's still only four. He's a proper
chasing sort that got stretched into jumping errors at the third last and last
here. Over fences he'll have more time to measure the obstacles and I think that
will suit him.
It also seems likely that Escort'men will appreciate a step
up to two and a half miles, quite possibly more. He would be less likely to get
stretched into jumping errors over longer and he's certainly built and bred for
distance beyond two miles.
If he does switch to chasing I suspect Escort'men will not
be an Arkle candidate because two miles will prove on the short side for him.
Then again I could be wrong because at present it looks like the reason
Escort'men ran below form at the Aintree Festival is that he bounced due to
running so fast at Kempton on his previous outing. Most high class two mile
chasers are bests fresh and regress in the same way quite often off fast
performances.
Basically it's just too early to say with Escort'men. All I
can say right now is he's smart and can run faster than this.
|